Skip to main content
· 6/18/2003

North Carolina Ex Rel. Hailey v. Westmoreland

Citations

  • 267 F. Supp. 2d 497
  • 2003 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 10300
  • 2003 WL 21404139

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • finding that “any striking, if it occurred at all, occurred without warning and was very brief in nature” and “[t]oo brief, in fact, for [bystanding officer] to have reacted and stopped [other officer]”
  • finding that where the plaintiff was prosecuted for assaulting an officer and for cocaine possession, he could make out a claim for malicious prosecution as to the assault charge even though he did not challenge the possession charge
  • dismissing excessive force claim premised on bystander lability where both applications of force were “without warning” and “very brief in nature”
  • Finding no bystander liability claim where violence occurred without warning and was very brief in nature, too brief for bystander to have reacted and stopped other officer.
  • granting summary judgment for defendant officer who did not have a reasonable opportunity to prevent harm to the plaintiff where another officer’s act in striking the plaintiff occurred, if it all, without warning and in a very brief time period

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Eliason

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.