North Carillon, LLC v. CRC 603, LLC

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that a statutory provision providing for the retroactive effect of a new law “would be unconstitutional if the [new law] substantively changed the prior law and impaired the existing right of [the contracting parties]”
• turning to statutory history “to resolve an ambiguity in the statutory text,” after determining that the plain meaning rule was not dispositive

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).