Skip to main content
· 8/23/2006

North Amer. Treat. Sys. v. Scottsdale Ins.

Citations

  • 943 So. 2d 429
  • 2006 WL 2422584

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • where allegations in petition were broad enough to fall outside the scope of the policy exclusion, insurer breached its duty to defend, although the exclusion actually precluded coverage
  • where allegations in petition were broad enough to fall outside the scope of the policy exclusion, insurer breached its duty to defend, although the exclusion actually precluded coverage
  • exclusionary clause stated that coverage “does not apply” to previously established coverage

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Carter, C.J., Downing and Gaidry

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.