Skip to main content
· 5/31/1928

Norstrom v. Wahl

Citations

  • 27 F.2d 637
  • 1928 U.S. App. LEXIS 3448

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • concluding that statutory language foreclosed challenges to agency actions on the basis of “[a]ll other applicable [fjederal environmental and natural resource laws”
  • determining that statutory language provided for judicial review when an agency’s decision was “arbitrary and capricious or otherwise not in accordance with applicable law (other than those laws specified in subsection (i) lie., all federal environmental and natural resource laws]

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Alschuler, Anderson

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.