Norris v. Elliott

Citations

• 39 Cal. 72

Syllabus

<p>Slander.—Practice.—In actions for slander, it is not necessary to show that the slanderous words were spoken on the precise day alleged in the complaint.</p> <p>Idem.—Pleading.—When the answer denies that the slanderous words were spoken at the time and place alleged, or at any other time or place, and the Statute of Limitations is not pleaded, it is not error to admit proof of the speaking of the words at any time Before the commencement of the action.</p> <p>Idem. —Proof of Malice.—Proof of the repeating of the words, after suit brought, is admissible to show malice.</p>