Kentucky Supreme Court· 11/21/2002

Norris v. Commonwealth

Citations

89 S.W.3d 411
2002 Ky. LEXIS 234
2002 WL 31819656

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

noting that under the doctrine of curative admissibility, “a witness will make an inadmissible assertion and the opposing party is then permitted to introduce evidence to the contrary.”
“In a typical case, a witness will make an inadmissible 17 assertion and the opposing party is then permitted to introduce evidence to the contrary.”
“[I]n exercising its discretion under Rule 403, a trial court must consider in the balancing test. . . other available evidence to prove the fact in issue.”
“[I]n exercising its discretion under Rule 403, a trial court must consider in the balancing test. . . other available evidence to prove the fact in issue.”
“[I]n exercising its discretion under Rule 403, a trial court must consider in the balancing test . . . other available evidence to prove the fact in issue.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Cooper, Graves, Johnstone, Keller, Lambert, Stumbo, Wintersheimer

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

14 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

16 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.