Skip to main content
· 5/15/1837

Norris v. Bridgham

Citations

  • 14 Me. 429

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that a parent’s appellate challenge to parental termination did not encompass a challenge to the appointment of managing conservator
  • holding that a parent’s appellate challenge to parental termination did not encompass a challenge to the appointment of managing conservator
  • holding that a parent’s appellate challenge to parental termination did not encompass a challenge to the appointment of managing conservator
  • holding that trial court has wide discretion in determining conservatorship and trial court’s decision will not be overturned unless it is arbitrary and unreasonable
  • holding that trial court has wide discretion in determining conservatorship and trial court’s decision will not be overturned unless it is arbitrary and unreasonable
  • holding that because Department sought appointment as child’s conservator on multiple grounds, when one ground overturned on appeal, remaining unchallenged ground could support that appointment

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Shepuev

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.