· 5/15/1837
Norris v. Bridgham
Citations
- 14 Me. 429
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that a parent’s appellate challenge to parental termination did not encompass a challenge to the appointment of managing conservator
- holding that a parent’s appellate challenge to parental termination did not encompass a challenge to the appointment of managing conservator
- holding that a parent’s appellate challenge to parental termination did not encompass a challenge to the appointment of managing conservator
- holding that trial court has wide discretion in determining conservatorship and trial court’s decision will not be overturned unless it is arbitrary and unreasonable
- holding that trial court has wide discretion in determining conservatorship and trial court’s decision will not be overturned unless it is arbitrary and unreasonable
- holding that because Department sought appointment as child’s conservator on multiple grounds, when one ground overturned on appeal, remaining unchallenged ground could support that appointment
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Shepuev
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.