Norris Carlton Taylor v. R. C. Lee, Warden of Central Prison, Raleigh, North Carolina

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• rejecting a theory that the period of limitation does not toll during the time between a court’s ruling and the timely filing of an appeal
• rejecting a theory that the period of limitation does not toll during the time between a court's ruling and the timely filing of an appeal
• “[W]e believe that tolling the entire period of state proceedings upholds ‘the principle of comity that underlies the exhaustion doctrine.’ ”
• “[W]e believe that tolling the entire period of state [post-conviction] proceedings upholds ‘the principle of comity that underlies the exhaustion doctrine.’ ”
• \[W]e believe that tolling the entire period of state proceedings upholds `the principle of comity that underlies the exhaustion doctrine.' \
• petition filed with at least eight days to spare, after tolling

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).