Skip to main content
· 8/9/2002

Normita Santo Domingo Fajardo v. Immigration and Naturalization Service

Citations

  • 300 F.3d 1018
  • 2002 Daily Journal DAR 9106
  • 2002 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 7240
  • 2002 U.S. App. LEXIS 16045
  • 2002 WL 1822168

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “The BIA summarily affirmed the IJ’s order, which therefore constitutes the final agency decision under review.”
  • “The BIA summarily affirmed the IJ’s order, which therefore constitutes the final agency decision under review.”
  • “It is difficult to imagine how [an immigration paralegal’s] failure to inform [petitioner] of her need to appear at her deportation hearing would not constitute an exceptional circumstance excusing her absence.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Lay, Canby, Paez

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.