Norment v. Mardorf
Citations
- 26 N.M. 210
- 190 P. 733
Syllabus
<p>SYLLABUS BY THE COURT.</p> <p>1. Where appellant takes up less than the entire record under section 32, c. 43, Laws 1917, he cannot, under section 34 of the same chapter, suggest a diminution of the record or ask for a certiorari to supply such diminution -after he has filed his brief on the merits. P. 213</p> <p>2. While section 23, c. 43, Laws 1917, provides that in all cases the transcript of record shall contain a copy of the final judgment, order, decision, or conviction appealed from, it is the duty of appellant to see that the transcript filed complies with this section, as the duty rests upon the appellant in all cases to see that a proper transcript is filed in the appellate court. P. 214</p> <p>3. Where appellant takes up less than the entire récord under section 32, c. 43, Laws 1917, it is his duty in his praecipe to set forth the question which he desires to have reviewed on appeal and the portion of the record which he deems essential. P. 215</p>
Judges: Parker, Raynolds, Roberts
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.