Normandy Apartments, Ltd. v. U.S. Department of Housing & Urban Development

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that Tucker Act did not apply where plaintiff sought injunctive relief against HUD’s “attempts to terminate Housing Assistance Payments”
• concluding that a plaintiff's claim retained significant prospective value such that its \primary object remains securing equitable relief\ even though the claim's success, \over a year after HUD ceased disbursing funds to the company\ could cause the agency to make belated payments
• explaining that the Tucker Act impliedly forbids declaratory and injunctive relief for contract claims, but not for claims founded on the federal Constitution, statutes, or regulations
• “The defense of sovereign immunity is jurisdictional in nature, depriving courts of subject-matter jurisdiction where applicable.”
• “The defense of sovereign immunity is jurisdictional in nature, depriving courts of subject-matter jurisdiction where applicable.”
• “Sovereign immunity generally shields the United States, its agencies, and its officers acting in their official capacity from suit.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).