New Mexico Supreme Court· 1/18/1990
Normand by and Through Normand v. Ray
Citations
- 109 N.W. 403
- 109 N.M. 403
- 785 P.2d 743
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- findings of trial court must address those ultimate findings of fact necessary to support its decision
- findings of trial court must address those ultimate findings of fact necessary to support its decision
- addressing Section 40-4-9(B) and (C) in a case involving a child custody dispute between the father and maternal grandparents in which there was no dissolution of marriage before the court
- addressing Section 40-4-9(B) and (C) in a case involving a child custody dispute between the father and maternal grandparents in which there was no dissolution of marriage before the court
- addressing Section 40 — 4-9(B) and (C) in a case involving a child custody dispute between the father and maternal grandparents in which there was no dissolution of marriage before the court
- “‘Ultimate facts’ are those facts which are essential and determinative facts upon which the trial court’s conclusions are based.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Baca, Donnelly, Sosa
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
11 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Rhinehart v. NowlinNew Mexico Court of Appeals· 1990-12-18· cited 56×
- Monroe v. MonroeCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1993-03-26· cited 54×
- Jeantete v. JeanteteNew Mexico Court of Appeals· 1990-12-31· cited 36×
- State ex rel. Children, Youth & Families Department v. Brandy S.New Mexico Court of Appeals· 2007-08-24· cited 27×
- Torres v. Plastech Corp.New Mexico Supreme Court· 1997-10-01· cited 20×
- Ynclan v. WoodwardSupreme Court of Oklahoma· 2010-03-25· cited 19×
- Chatterjee v. KingNew Mexico Court of Appeals· 2010-12-01· cited 15×
- Kruskal v. MossNew Mexico Court of Appeals· 1998-03-06· cited 10×
- Amax Magnesium Corp. v. Utah State Tax CommissionCourt of Appeals of Utah· 1993-03-03· cited 4×
- Walck v. City of AlbuquerqueNew Mexico Court of Appeals· 1994-04-18· cited 3×
- Puma v. Wal-Mart Stores EastNew Mexico Court of Appeals· 2022-08-09
Cites
17 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Schuermann v. SchuermannNew Mexico Supreme Court· 1980-03-06· cited 35×
- Fitzsimmons v. FitzsimmonsNew Mexico Court of Appeals· 1986-03-18· cited 29×
- State Ex Rel. Goodmans Office Furnishings, Inc. v. Page & Wirtz Construction Co.New Mexico Supreme Court· 1984-11-01· cited 26×
- Specter v. SpecterNew Mexico Supreme Court· 1973-05-04· cited 24×
- Alfieri v. AlfieriNew Mexico Court of Appeals· 1987-01-06· cited 23×
- Lopez v. LopezNew Mexico Supreme Court· 1981-12-30· cited 19×
- Goldie v. YakerNew Mexico Supreme Court· 1967-10-23· cited 19×
- Stone v. StoneNew Mexico Supreme Court· 1968-07-22· cited 14×
- Merrill v. MerrillNew Mexico Supreme Court· 1971-03-22· cited 13×
- Seeley v. JaramilloNew Mexico Court of Appeals· 1986-09-30· cited 13×
- Apodaca v. Unknown Heirs of the Following Persons Who Are Adjudged to Be Owners & Proprietors of the Tome Land GrantNew Mexico Supreme Court· 1982-09-07· cited 12×
- Cowan v. ChalamidasNew Mexico Supreme Court· 1982-04-20· cited 12×
- Sanchez v. SanchezNew Mexico Supreme Court· 1973-01-12· cited 10×
- Hughes v. HughesNew Mexico Supreme Court· 1984-03-28· cited 9×
- Greene v. FrenchNew Mexico Court of Appeals· 1982-02-04· cited 8×
- Romine v. RomineNew Mexico Supreme Court· 1983-11-03· cited 7×
- Gulf States Equipment Company v. ToombsCourt of Appeals of Texas· 1958-09-30· cited 4×
Other cases named Normand by and Through Normand v. Ray
1 other CourtListener record shares this case name.
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.