Norman v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that objection “first presented to the court in the form of a motion to suppress while the defense was presenting its case, was clearly not timely and, consequently, presents nothing for review.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

2 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Connally v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1973-02-21· cited 5×
• Stetson Roy Sekula v. State
  Tex. App. Ct., 4th Dist. (San Antonio)· 2018-03-21

Cites

3 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Erwin v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1961-06-07· cited 26×
• Northcutt v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1972-03-08· cited 17×
• Bitela v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1971-03-03· cited 8×