Skip to main content

Norman v. State

Citations

  • 523 S.W.2d 669
  • 1975 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 994

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting that rulings on a motion in limine are preliminary in nature and subject to the trial court’s reconsideration during the trial
  • noting that motion in limine is “by its nature, subject to reconsideration throughout the course of the trial”
  • holding nothing was preserved for review where trial court granted state’s motion in limine and instructed defense to offer evidence outside jury’s presence, but record did “not reflect a tender and exclusion of particular evidence”
  • “The purpose of a motion in limine is to prevent particular matters from coming before the jury.”
  • “The purpose of a motion in limine is to prevent particular matters from coming before the jury.”
  • mere granting of a motion in limine cannot constitute reversible error

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Odom, Onion, Douglas, Morrison

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

56 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

5 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.