Skip to main content
Federal & State Lawfederalstatelaw.com
Home/Federal/Cases
Eighth Circuit· 1/8/1985

Norman Stumes v. Herman Solem

Citations

  • 752 F.2d 317
  • 1985 U.S. App. LEXIS 27584

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • finding that failure to give new Miranda warnings did not establish Mosley violation because suspect's conduct indicated that he was aware of his Miranda rights
  • 5-hour interval between waiver of Miranda rights and defendant’s statement to law enforcement not unreasonable
  • discussion of potential need for an attorney not an invocation of right to silence
  • 5-hour interval between waiver of Miranda rights and defendant's statement to law enforcement was reasonable
  • re-administration of Miranda warning was not required when there was more than six hours between warning and waiver
  • “The nearly five-hour break between the interviews does not of itself invalidate the initial waiver. The significance of this elapsed time must be assessed in view of [defendant’s] knowledge and conduct and other relevant circumstances.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Lay, Henley, Arnold

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

63 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

14 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases named Norman Stumes v. Herman Solem

1 other CourtListener record shares this case name.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.