Norman S. Adams v. Avondale Industries, Inc. Connell Industries, Inc. Connell Limited Partnership

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that “Congress chose not to impose vesting requirements on welfare benefit plans for fear that placing such a burden on employers would inhibit the establishment of such plans”
• nothing in Firestone \implies the invalidity of the case law excluding amendments of welfare benefit plans from scrutiny under ERISA's fiduciary duty requirements\
• nothing in Firestone “implies the invalidity of the case law excluding amendments of welfare benefit plans from scrutiny under ERISA’s fiduciary duty requirements”
• declining to create a substantive remedy for violations of Sec. 1102 without detrimental reliance
• “[A] company does not act in a fiduciary capacity when deciding to amend or terminate a welfare benefits plan”
• Welfare benefit plans \are explicitly exempted ... from the obligations of the ... vesting sections ... of [ERISA].\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).