Norman L. Birl v. W. J. Estelle, Jr., Director Texas Department of Corrections

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that a pro se “litigant acquiesces in and subjects himself to the established rules of practice and procedure.”
• holding that a pro se “litigant acquiesces in and subjects himself to the established rules of practice and procedure.”
• finding that pro se litigants are not exempt from compliance with the rules of service
• explaining that a pro se litigant is “not exempt . . . from compliance with relevant rules of procedural and substantive law”
• explaining a pro se litigant is “not exempt . . . from compliance with relevant rules of procedural and substantive law”
• “The right of self-representation does not exempt a party from compliance with relevant rules of procedure and substantive law.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).