Norman Harris v. Shinseki

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that 38 U.S.C. § 7292 precludes review of the Veterans Court’s factual determinations or applications of law to fact, but allows review of questions of law
• \[W]e may consider whether the Veterans Court failed to consider a controlling rule of law in reaching its decision.\
• “Our previous decisions have made clear that pro se filings must be read liberally.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).