Norman D. Carter and Cecilia P. Carter v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that, although a party is pro se, he is “expected to abide by the rules of the court in which he litigates” (citation omitted)
• holding that, although 26 a party is pro se, he is “expected to abide by the rules of the court in which he litigates” (citation 1 omitted)
• explaining that a pro se litigant must “abide by the rules of the court in which he litigates”
• noting that pro se litigants are “expected to abide by the rules of the court in which [they] litigate[]”
• stating that a pro se party is “expected to abide by the rules of the court in which he litigates”
• noting that pro se litigants are “expected to abide by the rules of the court in which [they] litigate[]”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).