Norman Communications v. Texas Eastman Co.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that an appellate court’s review of any restricted appeal may include review of the legal and factual sufficiency of the evidence
• stating that review by restricted appeal affords appellant same scope of review as ordinary appeal, which is review of entire case
• stating that review by restricted appeal affords appellant same scope of review as ordinary appeal, which is review of entire case
• recognizing review of legal and factual sufficiency claims is permissible when a post-answer default judgment is challenged by restricted appeal
• stating that review by restricted appeal affords appellant same scope of review as ordinary appeal, which is review of entire case
• holding review on restricted appeal may include legal and factual sufficiency of evidence issues

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).