Skip to main content
· 12/18/1990

Norma Frasca v. United States

Citations

  • 921 F.2d 450
  • 20 Fed. R. Serv. 3d 1285
  • 1990 U.S. App. LEXIS 21844
  • 1990 WL 205107

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that dismissal under Rule 4(j) is mandatory unless good cause is shown and that “dismissal is proper even if it occurs after the expiration of the applicable statute of limitations period, and its effect is to bar the plaintiffs claim”
  • holding that the filing of a complaint in action under Tort Claims Act tolled the statute of limitations on the underlying claim only for the 120-day period within which plaintiff was required to serve a defendant and not beyond
  • noting that “the statute of limitations for the underlying claim is tolled during th[e] [90-day] period”
  • discussing Advisory Committee Notes to the 1993 Amendment at 56

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Re, Feinberg, Cardamone

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.