Norm Launi, II v. Hampshire County Prosecuting Attorney's Office and County of Hampshire, WV

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the district court abused its discretion by excluding affidavits without first identifying how they conflicted with prior deposition testimony
• holding that the district court abused its discretion by excluding affidavits without first identifying how they conflicted with prior deposition testimony
• holding that the district court abused its discretion by excluding affidavits without first identifying how they conflicted with prior deposition testimony
• concluding that an issue was preserved for appellate review where “both the opposing party and the district court understood” the party “to be asserting argument on point”
• explaining that it constitutes an error of law for a court to exclude an affidavit without identifying a contradiction to the affiant’s deposition testimony
• finding that the district court abused its discretion by excluding affidavits without first identifying how they conflicted with prior deposition testimony

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).