Skip to main content
· 6/16/2010

Norkunas v. SEAHORSE NB, LLC

Citations

  • 720 F. Supp. 2d 1313
  • 2010 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 59503
  • 2010 WL 2431874

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting that “[n]umerous courts in the Middle District of Florida have applied the Eleventh Circuit’s rationale [recognizing tester standing under the Fair Housing Act] to confer tester standing under the ADA as well”
  • stating the defendaht’s suggestion that there were “countless other hotels” in the area had no bearing on the plaintiffs intent to stay at the defendant hotel: “Because Plaintiff could visit another hotel does not overcome his stated desire to have access to this hotel.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Timothy J. Corrigan

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.