Noriega Ojeda, Nicole Alexa v. Suris Cancel, Xavier J

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that a RICO plaintiff must demonstrate not only “but for” causation but also proximate cause in order to have standing
• recognizing that the RICO civil private action provision was modeled after § 4 of the Clayton Act
• holding that to state a civil RICO claim, “[n]ot only must the injury be cognizable, but there must be a causal relationship between it and the RICO violations”
• holding that the RICO statute has a proximate cause requirement
• explaining that this doctrine has traditionally required \some direct relation between the injury asserted and the injurious conduct alleged\
• providing that to state a RICO claim, a plaintiff must show that the defendant’s alleged conduct was the proximate cause of the plaintiff’s injuries

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).