Norful v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that, although circumstantial, the evidence was sufficient to support a burglary conviction and the jury was authorized to disbelieve the defendant’s alternative hypothesis—that another person could have entered his apartment and hid the stolen property there—as unreasonable

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).