Norfolk & Western Railway Co. v. Accident & Casualty Ins.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding multiple occurrences because “a wide variety of machines in a number of different locations created a variety of sounds over the course of a number of years,” which sounds injured the hearing of certain railroad employees who worked near these machines
• additional discovery would not substantially add to the arguments in support of the opposing interpretation of the \occupational disease” and \cessation of work” clause of the policy
• additional discovery would not substantially add to the arguments in support of the opposing interpretation of the \occupational disease\ and \cessation of work\ clause of the policy

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).