Norfolk Southern Railway Corp. v. Tiller

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “The employee’s eligibility for retirement benefits at a particular age . . . is unquestionably relevant evidence at to the probable age at which the employee might have been expected to stop working.”
• “[Kelch] reaffirmed that evidence of benefits from a collateral source is not admissible to diminish damages even though it may sometimes be admissible to prove that the plaintiff is malingering or exaggerating the extent of the injuries.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).