· 2/18/2015
Norfolk Southern Railway Co. v. Thomas Perez
Citations
- 778 F.3d 507
- 2015 FED App. 0026P
- 202 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 3371
- 2015 U.S. App. LEXIS 2460
- 2015 WL 670158
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- noting Congress’ explicit intent to prevent people from seeking protection under both the FRSA and OSHA whistleblower provisions
- “We must presume that Congress says what it means and means what it says, and therefore must apply a statute as it is written, giving its terms the ordinary meaning that they carried when the statute was enacted.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Cole, Griffin, Carr
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.