Skip to main content
· 2/18/2015

Norfolk Southern Railway Co. v. Thomas Perez

Citations

  • 778 F.3d 507
  • 2015 FED App. 0026P
  • 202 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 3371
  • 2015 U.S. App. LEXIS 2460
  • 2015 WL 670158

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting Congress’ explicit intent to prevent people from seeking protection under both the FRSA and OSHA whistleblower provisions
  • “We must presume that Congress says what it means and means what it says, and therefore must apply a statute as it is written, giving its terms the ordinary meaning that they carried when the statute was enacted.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Cole, Griffin, Carr

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.