Skip to main content
· 12/11/2008

Norfolk Southern Railway Co. v. Alabama Department of Revenue

Citations

  • 550 F.3d 1306
  • 2008 U.S. App. LEXIS 25286
  • 2008 WL 5173113

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • listing examples of courts finding railroads targeted by various state tax schemes
  • listing examples of courts finding railroads targeted by various state tax schemes
  • listing examples of courts finding railroads targeted by various state tax schemes
  • “The language of section (b)(4) prohibits a discriminatory ‘tax’ not a dis­ criminatory tax exemption”
  • “The language of section (b)(4) prohibits a discriminatory ‘tax’ not a discriminatory tax exemption”
  • “The language of section (b)(4) prohibits a discriminatory ‘tax’ not a discriminatory tax exemption”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Barkett, Wilson, Pogue

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.