Norfolk Shipbuilding & Drydock Corp. v. M/V Sequoia

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that an expert witness may not “act[] as a conduit for another witness’s testimony in the guise of an expert’s opinion”
• noting that the court may consider “any additional facts that [are] both integral to the parties’ arguments and undisputed”
• holding “the court will follow [its previous decisions], and will disregard [a party’s] additional facts unless it is clear from the parties’ briefing that those facts are both material and undisputed”
• “In this case, the court will … disregard Plaintiff’s additional facts unless it is clear from the parties’ briefing that those facts are both material and undisputed.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).