Skip to main content
· 10/7/2013

Norfolk S. Corp. v. Zimmerman

Citations

  • 134 S. Ct. 164
  • 187 L. Ed. 2d 41
  • 82 U.S.L.W. 3179
  • 571 U.S. 826
  • 2013 WL 2903502
  • 2013 U.S. LEXIS 5469

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • explaining that an ALJ must “provide enough analysis to allow a re-viewing court” to understand why an opinion was rejected
  • finding that claimant could not squat undercut ALJ’s finding that claimant could stoop, kneel, crouch, or crawl
  • explaining that the substantial evidence standard is satisfied where the ALJ builds an accurate and logical bridge from the evidence to his conclusion
  • stating that “an ALJ may not ignore evidence that undercuts [his] conclusion”
  • questioning how obese plaintiff with other non-severe impairments could balance, stoop, kneel, crouch, and crawl
  • questioning how obese plaintiff with other non-severe impairments could balance, stoop, kneel, crouch, and 6 crawl

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.