· 10/7/2013
Norfolk S. Corp. v. Zimmerman
Citations
- 134 S. Ct. 164
- 187 L. Ed. 2d 41
- 82 U.S.L.W. 3179
- 571 U.S. 826
- 2013 WL 2903502
- 2013 U.S. LEXIS 5469
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- explaining that an ALJ must “provide enough analysis to allow a re-viewing court” to understand why an opinion was rejected
- finding that claimant could not squat undercut ALJ’s finding that claimant could stoop, kneel, crouch, or crawl
- explaining that the substantial evidence standard is satisfied where the ALJ builds an accurate and logical bridge from the evidence to his conclusion
- stating that “an ALJ may not ignore evidence that undercuts [his] conclusion”
- questioning how obese plaintiff with other non-severe impairments could balance, stoop, kneel, crouch, and crawl
- questioning how obese plaintiff with other non-severe impairments could balance, stoop, kneel, crouch, and 6 crawl
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.