· 4/2/1974
Norfolk & Dedham Fire Insurance v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co.
Citations
- 318 A.2d 659
- 132 Vt. 341
- 1974 Vt. LEXIS 347
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- observing that the “competing equities must be considered in any subrogation ... situation”
- “Subrogation is an equity creature akin to and derived from the law of unjust enrichment and restitution.”
- one who pays as “volunteer” rather than under legal duty can not be subrogated to rights of another
- “It is a doctrine which has particular approval in Vermont as between insurer and insured.”
- “Subrogation is an equity creature akin to and derived from the law of unjust enrichment and restitution.”
- subrogee must have clear equity and subrogation may be defeated by countervailing equities
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Keyser, Shangraw, Barney, Smith, Key, Daley
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.