Skip to main content
· 4/2/1974

Norfolk & Dedham Fire Insurance v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co.

Citations

  • 318 A.2d 659
  • 132 Vt. 341
  • 1974 Vt. LEXIS 347

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • observing that the “competing equities must be considered in any subrogation ... situation”
  • “Subrogation is an equity creature akin to and derived from the law of unjust enrichment and restitution.”
  • one who pays as “volunteer” rather than under legal duty can not be subrogated to rights of another
  • “It is a doctrine which has particular approval in Vermont as between insurer and insured.”
  • “Subrogation is an equity creature akin to and derived from the law of unjust enrichment and restitution.”
  • subrogee must have clear equity and subrogation may be defeated by countervailing equities

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Keyser, Shangraw, Barney, Smith, Key, Daley

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.