Skip to main content
· 4/2/2002

Nordmarken v. City of Richfield

Citations

  • 641 N.W.2d 343
  • 2002 Minn. App. LEXIS 368
  • 2002 WL 485197

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • concluding that field preemption existed when the legislature set out a “detailed and elaborate, structure of procedural authority and processes” for municipal land-use planning
  • concluding that field preemption existed when the legislature set out a \detailed and elaborate structure of procedural authority and processes\ for municipal land-use planning
  • holding that if preemption has occurred, a local law purporting to govern an aspect of the preempted field is void even if the law is not directly in conflict with the state law
  • “[d]espite the broad governance authority conferred through a home rule charter, any charter provision that conflicts with state public policy is invalid”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Hanson, Parker, Shumaker

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.