Nordman v. Carlson

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• denying mandamus relief from a discovery stay except allowing the deposition of the seventy-one year old plaintiff
• denying mandamus relief from a discovery stay except allowing the deposition of the seventy-one year old plaintiff
• directing district court to allow Rule 27(a) deposition because “it would be ignoring the facts of life to say that a 71-year old witness will be available, to give his deposition or testimony, at an undeterminable future date”
• concerns over advanced age of a witness could be allevi- ated by permitting a deposition to preserve testimony, and did not prevent a stay
• court permitted Rule 27(a) deposition of 71-year old witness in suit that had been stayed pending resolution of parallel criminal prosecution
• order denying leave to depose 71-year-old witness

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).