Nordica USA Corp. v. Ole Sorensen

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that request for jurisdictional discovery raised in objection to Rule 12(b)(2) motion was timely
• holding that a request for jurisdictional discovery raised in objection was timely
• “The motion [for jurisdictional discovery] must be timely and properly supported . . . must present facts to the court which show why jurisdiction would be found if discovery were permitted. Plaintiffs must specify the type of evidence they think they will find.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).