Norden-Powers v. Beveridge

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• commenting on “the wisdom of the Hague Convention that issues regarding custody should be decided by the courts of the country of habitual residence, rather than, as here, a court acting in a country the Children are visiting on extended holiday”
• the court “may under Article 15 take notice of . . . decisions” made by the Australian family court

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

10 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Souratgar v. Fair
  Second Circuit· 2013-06-13· cited 79×
• Koc v. Koc
  E.D. New York· 2001-01-18· cited 46×
• Lozano v. Alvarez
  S.D. New York· 2011-08-22· cited 20×
• Jakubik v. Schmirer
  S.D. New York· 2013-07-26· cited 20×
• Villegas Duran v. Arribada Beaumont
  Second Circuit· 2008-07-18· cited 18×
• Filipczak v. Filipczak
  S.D. New York· 2011-12-23· cited 10×
• Armiliato v. Zaric-Armiliato
  S.D. New York· 2001-05-03· cited 7×
• Mohácsi v. Rippa
  E.D. New York· 2018-11-06· cited 6×
• Souratgar v. Lee
  Second Circuit· 2013-06-26
• Duran v. Beaumont
  Second Circuit· 2008-07-21

Cites

4 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Emanuel Friedrich v. Jeana Michele Friedrich, David Harper and Shirley Harper
  Sixth Circuit· 1996-03-13· cited 354×
• Felix Blondin v. Marthe Dubois
  Second Circuit· 1999-08-17· cited 134×
• Stephen Halladay Croll v. Mei Yee Croll
  Second Circuit· 2000-09-20· cited 86×
• Brooke v. Willis
  S.D. New York· 1995-08-02· cited 20×