Norden-Powers v. Beveridge

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• commenting on “the wisdom of the Hague Convention that issues regarding custody should be decided by the courts of the country of habitual residence, rather than, as here, a court acting in a country the Children are visiting on extended holiday”
• the court “may under Article 15 take notice of . . . decisions” made by the Australian family court

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).