Skip to main content
· 2/28/1991

Nord v. Shoreline Savings Ass'n

Citations

  • 805 P.2d 800
  • 116 Wash. 2d 477
  • 1991 Wash. LEXIS 79

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • each plaintiff testified about his anger and shock at the defendant’s actions, and this testimony in conjunction with the other facts of the case supported an award for emotional distress
  • objective symptoms need be shown only where a claim for negligent infliction of emotional distress is asserted or where the plaintiff is seeking to establish the elements of the intentional tort of outrage
  • acknowledging objective symptoms are required for non- 16 intentional torts

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Brachtenbach

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.