Norberg v. Norberg

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that, in determining whether modification of decree is justified, trial court must take into account all of the circumstances of the parties

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

7 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Toni v. Toni
  North Dakota Supreme Court· 2001-12-05· cited 24×
• In re Arvenitis
  Supreme Court of New Hampshire· 2005-10-18· cited 14×
• Laflamme v. Laflamme
  Supreme Court of New Hampshire· 1999-12-28· cited 12×
• In re Yannalfo
  Supreme Court of New Hampshire· 2002-04-16· cited 6×
• In re Estate of Wilber
  Supreme Court of New Hampshire· 2013-08-21· cited 4×
• Alerus Financial v. Lamb
  North Dakota Supreme Court· 2001-12-05
• In re Schaulin-Viviers
  Supreme Court of New Hampshire· 2012-02-10

Cites

7 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Swiezynski v. Civiello
  Supreme Court of New Hampshire· 1985-02-21· cited 31×
• MacFarlane v. Rich
  Supreme Court of New Hampshire· 1989-12-29· cited 29×
• Henry v. Henry
  Supreme Court of New Hampshire· 1987-03-06· cited 20×
• Madsen v. Madsen
  Supreme Court of New Hampshire· 1969-06-30· cited 18×
• Stebbins v. Stebbins
  Supreme Court of New Hampshire· 1981-12-08· cited 17×
• McSherry v. McSherry
  Supreme Court of New Hampshire· 1992-04-16· cited 10×
• Dupuis v. Click
  Supreme Court of New Hampshire· 1992-03-13· cited 9×