Noramco International v. Charlie's Pizza, Ltd.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• recognizing that “New York courts routinely hold that the continued existence of the predecessor entity is a bar to a mere continuation claim.”
• “We have recognized that the doctrine cannot apply absent continuity of ownership, which is the essence of a merger.”
• “We have recognized that the doctrine cannot apply absent continuity of ownership, which is the essence of a merger.”
• “We have recognized that the doctrine cannot apply absent continuity of ownership, which is the essence of a merger.”
• “We have recognized that the doctrine cannot apply absent continuity of ownership, which is the essence of a merger.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).