Skip to main content
· 9/30/1983

Nora C. BELL, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. BIRMINGHAM LINEN SERVICE, Etc., Defendant-Appellee

Citations

  • 715 F.2d 1552
  • 1983 U.S. App. LEXIS 16407
  • 32 Empl. Prac. Dec. (CCH) 33,831
  • 32 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 1673

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • employer’s change in his position in administrative proceeding, EEOC response and judicial proceeding is a relevant consideration in evaluating sufficiency of proof on rebuttal

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Tjoflat, Hill, Johnson

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.