· 9/30/1983
Nora C. BELL, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. BIRMINGHAM LINEN SERVICE, Etc., Defendant-Appellee
Citations
- 715 F.2d 1552
- 1983 U.S. App. LEXIS 16407
- 32 Empl. Prac. Dec. (CCH) 33,831
- 32 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 1673
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- employer’s change in his position in administrative proceeding, EEOC response and judicial proceeding is a relevant consideration in evaluating sufficiency of proof on rebuttal
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Tjoflat, Hill, Johnson
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.