Nopro Co. v. Town of Cherry Hills Village

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding there was no record support for finding that a developer would suffer a “substantial hardship” if made to comply with zoning restrictions because it purchased the land with full knowledge of the restrictions
• “[the] validity of zoning regulations has never been determined by the highest and best use concept or in terms of dollars and cents profitability.”
• \[the] validity of zoning regulations has never been determined by the highest and best use concept or in terms of dollars and cents profitability.\
• “[T]o sustain an attack upon the validity of a zoning limitation, the aggrieved property owner must show that the enforced restriction upon his property will preclude its use for any purpose to which it is reasonably adapted.”
• a “rural atmosphere” includes “small farms and large residential tracts, where farm animals and poultry would be permitted, bridle and walking paths be provided, open space be preserved and noise and traffic congestion be eliminated. ...”
• statute grants broad legislative discretion as to how to achieve declared objectives

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).