Noonan v. Wonderland Greyhound Park Realty LLC

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that “in the event [the plaintiff] seeks leave to amend . . . , he must file the proper motion for leave with supporting legal authority, see LR. 7.1, and attach a copy of the proposed amended complaint”
• declining to address new arguments in reply memorandum “that could have been raised in a supporting memorandum”
• considering an argument waived when it was raised for the first time in the reply brief
• finding new argument raised in reply memorandum was waived because \[t]he purpose a reply memorandum is not to file new arguments that could have been raised in a supporting memorandum\
• “The purpose of a reply memorandum is not to file new arguments that could have been raised in a supporting memorandum.”
• collecting cases on waiver of arguments made in reply briefs

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).