Nonnenmacher v. City of Warwick

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• upholding a statute reducing pension benefits and requiring retired firemen to return overpayments because, despite being a substantial impairment, it was in the public interest
• Rhode Island Supreme Court indicated that vested contractual rights might not be violated where the impairment caused by a change in benefits is \not substantial\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).