Nona R. Johnson v. United States

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• losses from theft within the meaning of section 165 \consist only of takings and deprivations in which the element of criminal intent has been involved\
• neither foreclosure by bank on property to enforce its security interest nor bank's exercise of its right of setoff against funds on deposit constituted a theft within the meaning of section 165

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).