Nolte v. MT TECHNOLOGY ENTERPRISES, LLC

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that a party who claims breach of contract has the burden of proving “with reasonable certainty” that the defendant caused the damage suffered
• holding that trial court had authority to impose sanctions because defendants violated discovery order, but that choice of sanction was abuse of discretion
• concluding that a party who claims breach of contract has the burden of proving “with reasonable certainty” that the defendant caused the damage suffered
• interpreting the phrase “may not maintain any action . . . until it has registered in the Commonwealth” (alteration in original) (emphasis omitted
• vacating the Trial Court's ruling on damages be- ' cause the Trial Court abused its discretion when it prohibited cross-examination by the defendants during the damages presentation
• “[I]n an action encompassing several claims, the prevailing party is entitled to an award of costs and attorneys’ fees only for those claims for which (a) there is a contractual or statutory basis for such an award and (b) the party has prevailed.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).