Skip to main content
· 1/12/1979

Noll v. Rahal

Citations

  • 250 S.E.2d 741
  • 219 Va. 795
  • 1979 Va. LEXIS 171

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • concluding that, under District of Columbia law, nationally certified specialists are to be judged by a national standard of care
  • trial court did not abuse its discretion in disqualifying an expert witness even though “reasonable trial judges could properly disagree” and “some members of this [C]ourt, had they presided at the trial, may have admitted” the testimony

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Compton

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.