Nolasco v. Holder

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• determining that the DHS’s failure to serve a minor respondent’s family in accordance with former 8 C.F.R. § 103.5a(c)(2)(ii
• stating that due process is generally satisfied where an alien received notice of the required information in the Notice to Appear and had a meaningful opportunity to participate in the removal proceedings
• declining to remand when there was “no evidence” of an “adverse effect on Petitioner’s ability to answer the Government’s charges”
• “There may well be instances in which ... failure to comply with [a procedural rule] results in a lack of notice or the denial of a meaningful opportunity to be heard such that ... due process rights are violated.”
• ʺThere may well be instances in which . . . failure to comply with [a procedural rule] results in a lack of notice or the denial of a meaningful opportunity to be heard such that . . . due process rights are violated.ʺ

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).