Noland v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that restitution cannot be ordered for a theft not encompassed within the charge contained in the information or for items outside the scope of the criminal prosecution

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

13 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Malarkey v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2008-02-01· cited 20×
• Bernard v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2003-11-21· cited 13×
• Dragani v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2000-06-01· cited 7×
• Kiefer v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2005-09-02· cited 4×
• SIMINSKI v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2009-01-23· cited 3×
• Medlin v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2015-12-04· cited 3×
• U.B. v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2007-10-05· cited 2×
• UB v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2007-10-05
• GP v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2008-12-03
• Balogac v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2004-11-05
• Russell v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2007-03-09
• G.P. v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2008-12-03
• Gabriel Verdejo v. the State of Florida
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2025-02-12

Cites

6 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Glaubius v. State
  Supreme Court of Florida· 1997-02-20· cited 94×
• State v. Williams
  Supreme Court of Florida· 1988-02-25· cited 87×
• J.S. v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1998-09-16· cited 21×
• Mitchell v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1995-12-08· cited 9×
• Rodriguez v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1997-04-11· cited 6×
• Stewart v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1993-12-23· cited 5×