· 10/31/1906
Noland v. Mildenberger
Citations
- 123 Ky. 660
- 97 S.W. 24
- 1906 Ky. LEXIS 197
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- finding economic value inherent in plaintiff’s purported trade secret, namely its confidential and proprietary business information
- plaintiff must allege the “efforts to maintain [the trade secret’s] confidentiality … in general terms”
- plaintiff must allege the “efforts to maintain [the trade secret’s] confidentiality . . . in general terms”
- “The existence of a trade secret ordinarily is a question of fact . . . best resolved by a fact finder after full presentation of evidence from each side.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Hobson
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.