Skip to main content
· 10/31/1906

Noland v. Mildenberger

Citations

  • 123 Ky. 660
  • 97 S.W. 24
  • 1906 Ky. LEXIS 197

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • finding economic value inherent in plaintiff’s purported trade secret, namely its confidential and proprietary business information
  • plaintiff must allege the “efforts to maintain [the trade secret’s] confidentiality … in general terms”
  • plaintiff must allege the “efforts to maintain [the trade secret’s] confidentiality . . . in general terms”
  • “The existence of a trade secret ordinarily is a question of fact . . . best resolved by a fact finder after full presentation of evidence from each side.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Hobson

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.