Noland v. Farmers Ins. Co., Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that insured could not recover, but not discussing any standard policy statute, and noting that insured had offer[ed] \no Arkansas law\ in support of contention that policy exclusion was contrary to public policy

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).